My meeting with my site supervisor went very well. Since
we are both members of the district design team, she already had a good
understanding of the project we are working on together. I had to infer much about the future plans of
the design team to create the step-by-step breakdown of the action plan. Since my site supervisor is campus principal and
prominent member of the design team, she had a much stronger vision of the plan
and where things would be going. Thus, she was
able to help me flesh out some of the steps I didn't originally foresee.
For example, she could suggest some more resources that she knows we are
going to use such as the Schlechty
Center, Marzano’s Classroom Instruction that Works, The Fundamental Five. She also reminded me that I needed to add
a step where we will seek the advice of stakeholders outside of our own design
team. This would include input from
university faculty, parents, business leaders, and community leaders. I
added this as step #7 in my action research plan. I know from all of my research thus far that asking the community and other stakeholders for input is a vital
step to any change process, so I was shocked that I forgot to add this
step. This just proved to me how
important it is to have other people reviewing an action research plan. Beyond
that she just addressed a few minor grammar and formatting issues that I
corrected in the new plan. I have copied the revised version of my action plan below to address the
changes I made as result of my meeting (the changes are represented in red).
_______________________________________________________________Goal: Research how current educators need to adapt to meet the needs and interests of 21st century students while still successfully preparing these students for life after graduation.
Action Steps
|
Persons
Responsible
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1. Setting the Foundation: Read articles
relevant to 21st century learning and the state of education in
the US and abroad
|
·
District Design Team
·
Brianna Riddell
|
Assigned Sept 21, 2012
Due Oct 11, 2012
|
Read the following articles:
1.
HPISD Visioning Document
2.
21st
Century Student Outcomes and Support Systems
3.
The Most Daring Education Reform of All
4.
Redefining College Readiness
5.
What Socrates would Say
|
·
Meet with District Design Team to discuss
relevance of each article to our district and needs
·
Summary Template for
each article
|
2. Divide
District Design Team into 5 groups to research the following characteristics
of educators:
a.
Skilled Assessments
b.
Creating Academically Prepared Students
c.
Adaptability
d.
Teachers as designers/explorers
e.
Teachers being risk takers
|
My group is a part of the Teacher as designers research group
|
Assigned Oct 11
Due Nov 15, 2012
|
·
Project-based Learning Schools (Coppell’s New
Tech High)
·
Buck Institute
·
Data on performance of students from PBL
schools
·
Constructivist Theory
·
Lee Crockett Learning Fluencies
·
The Schlechty Center
·
Marzano’s Classroom
Instruction that Works
·
The Fundamental Five
|
Meet as a research small group to discuss outcomes of research done
with resources listed and evaluate which techniques should be focused on as a
district - or - if the original 5
characteristics of educators need to be added to or amended.
Also complete a side by side comparison of
teacher characteristics based on research.
|
3. Design team will share and evaluate the research
done by individual groups and decide what further research is needed to
formulate a profile of an educator for the future.
|
Design Team
|
December 4, 2012
|
·
Collection of
studies done by individual groups
|
Through discussion, design team will
evaluate the research done to confirm, amend, or delete characteristics of an
educator.
|
4. Agree upon a desired list of characteristics that
define the educator of the future. Use
research to flesh out the details of how each of those characteristics should
manifest themselves in HPISD employees.
|
Design Team
|
Complete by Wed January 23, 2013
|
·
Research and
sources collected in in step 3
|
Final list of characteristics and
descriptions to be approved by district superintendent
|
5. Sub committees formed within District Design Team to
work on descriptions of agreed upon characteristics of an educator
|
·
District Design Team
·
Brianna Riddell
|
Complete work by February 28, 2013
|
·
To be
determined by group research…
|
Will be evaluated and edited by Design
Team
|
6. Design Team compiles list of characteristics with
descriptors and drafts proposal for the “Profile of an Educator for the
Future”
|
·
District Design Team
·
Brianna Riddell
|
Complete work by March 27, 2013
|
·
Compiled list
of all sub groups characteristics and descriptions
|
Will be evaluated and edited by Design
Team
|
7. Design Team will seek additional input
from broad-based groups.
|
·
Asst. Superintendent
·
District Design Team
·
Brianna Riddell
|
March – April 2013
|
·
University
Faculty
·
Parents
·
Business
Leaders
·
Community
Leaders
|
Design team will evaluate
and discuss input from broad-based group and include additional information
in research
|
8. Edit the format and wording for final “Profile of an
Educator for the Future” pamphlet
|
Editing Sub Group of District Design Team
|
Due by May 9, 2015
|
·
Last year’s
Learner of a Profile for the Future pamphlet will serve as a guide
|
·
Design team
will proof and edit final wording to be sent out for publishing
·
Board approval
|
9. Publish “Profile of an Educator for the Future
Pamphlet”
|
Asst. Superintendent and
Communications Dept.
|
Summer 2013
|
·
Final copy of Educator
for the Future Profile
·
Sources
|
Public evaluation: Parents will hold
teachers and staff accountable to profile presented
Internal evaluation: Admin will use the new educator profile an
assessment tool for current teachers and a hiring tool for future employees
|
When you seek input from outside sources, are you going to give them a list to choose from or you going to let them brainstorm? I was just wondering if this step might be better used earlier in the process or where it is. It might have better buy it if the stakeholders had a say earlier in the plan.
ReplyDelete